The project is driven by two major conceptual theories: 1) fit-for-purpose land administration; and 2) innovation theory. Fit-for-purpose land administration is part of broader development theories that argue that societal prosperity require secure land tenures, provided by a complete and up-to-date land administration system. Land administration systems are the actors, processes, and technologies that record and maintain information about people, land, and rights (see Dale and McLaughlin, 1999). Information about people and land is usually recorded textually, whilst, land information takes the form of parcel sketch plan and/or maps (digital or otherwise). Despite the simplicity of the idea, only 30-50 countries maintain land administration systems: institution and technical issues are the major reason for deficiencies in other countries. In response, fit-for-purpose land administration suggests technologies should be adapted, selected, and applied to match the capacity and cost constraints of a specific context. Meanwhile, innovation theory posits that inventions can be implemented at scale by integrating the processes and competencies of business, academia, government, investors, and beneficiaries (Allen et al, 2008): technology-push aligns with market-pull via undertaking needs assessment, design, pre- scaling and dissemination, supported scaling, and finally full dissemination. The proposal is premised on both theoretical underpinnings.